I am officially halfway through my practicum! Today the class was observed by my practicum advisor. I was nervous getting ready for the lesson to start knowing that my teaching was going to be formally evaluated. However, after students started to arrive my nerves settled. The goal of the lesson today was to have students talk about tourism and travel with minimum interruption from the teacher. The hope was to have students engage in a semi-fluent discussion with their peers. To try to engage the students more and facilitate more learning I adjusted our lesson format. Up to this point, the students were each assigned a role. This week only one student was assigned the role of discussion leader. The lesson also incorporated activities that made the students interact in the online environment using the interactive white board, shared notes and the public chat.
I think that as per usual there were pros and cons to the lesson design and activities this week. I thought that the use of the interactive white board was fun and that students enjoyed it. I also noticed that some of the quieter students were more engaged this week. However, the stronger students are still dominating the class discussion. I am beginning to wonder if the method of minimal teacher interruption is beneficial for the lower level students. These students may need more structure to help elicit conversation. I believe that there are benefits to having the class be very student centered, but in future lessons I may try to incorporate some activities that are more teacher driven to see if this helps the lower level students.
Regarding my teaching skills, I believe that there are several areas in which I can make improvements. I think that I need to make a conscious effort to provide summaries after each activity and at the end of the class. I also think that I need to make the purpose of the activities and the objectives of the lesson more clear to students.